Compatibilism
Compatibilists argue that
determinism is compatible with human freedom, and that indeterminism is not compatible or at best incoherent. They feel (correctly) that there must be a deterministic or causal connection between our will and our actions. This allows us to take
responsibility for our actions, including credit for the good and blame for the bad.
If the proximate cause of our actions was undetermined, the result of an uncaused quantum mechanical event in the mind, it would not be freedom of a kind worth having and we should disavow responsibility.
Most compatibilists accept the view of a causal chain of events going back indefinitely in time, consistent with the laws of nature, with the plan of an omniscient God, or with other
determinisms. As long as our own will is included in that causal chain, we are free, they say. And they think causality in nature is related to the very possibility of reason and logic. Without causality, they say, we could not be certain of the truths of our arguments. These are
dogmas of determinism.
We think compatibilists should be classified according to the particular
determinisms they think are compatible with human freedom. It is one thing to claim compatibility with physics, another to claim compatibility with God's foreknowledge.
Some compatibilists, often reluctantly, accept the view that random quantum mechanical events occur in the world. Whether in the physical world, in the biological world (where they are a key driver of genetic mutations), or in the mind, randomness and uncaused events are real. Quantum events introduce the possibility of accidents, novelty, and human
creativity. If compatibilists admit such indeterminism, they can probably be convinced of a stronger argument for human freedom.
See
Giving Determinists What They Say They Want.
Our
Cogito model assumes causality and
adequate determinism in the critical apparatus of the Macro Mind. From the Micro Mind however, as well as from the external world including other minds, come surprising and unpredictable events to feed the Agenda of possible thoughts and actions. The Cogito is compatibile with
both determinism and uncertainty. It lives in
Eddington's "halfway house."
Compatibilism explains the will. It cannot explain free. Our new mind model gets us
both free (random) and will (
adequately determined). The Cogito is genuine free will.
For Teachers
To hide this material, click on the Normal link.
Note there is also
incompatibilism. There are two kinds of incompatibilists, those who deny human freedom (usually called "hard" determinists) and those who assert it (often called voluntarists, free willists, or metaphysical libertarians - to distinguish them from political libertarians).
For Scholars
To hide this material, click on the Teacher or Normal link.
The first compatibilist was Carneades (214-129), the great Skeptic.
Normal |
Teacher |
Scholar
Chapter 1.4 - Philosophy 
