Citation for this page in APA citation style.           Close


Core Concepts

Adequate Determinism
Alternative Possibilities
Causa sui
Causality
Certainty
Chance
Chance Not Direct Cause
The Cogito Model
Compatibilism
Conceptual Analysis
Control
Could Do Otherwise
Creativity
De-liberation
Determinism
Disambiguation
Ethical Fallacy
"Free Will"
Free Will Mechanisms
Free Will Requirements
Future Contingency
Hard Incompatibilism
Illusionism
Impossibilism
Incompatibilism
Indeterminacy
Indeterminism
Libertarianism
Liberty of Indifference
Luck
Moral Responsibility
Moral Sentiments
Naturalism
Necessity
Predictability
Probability
Pseudo-Problem
Random When?/Where?
Rational Fallacy
Responsibility
Same Circumstances
Second Thoughts
Semicompatibilism
Soft Causality
Standard Argument
Temporal Sequence
Two-Stage Models
Uncertainty
Up To Us

Philosophers

Mortimer Adler
G.E.M.Anscombe
Thomas Aquinas
Aristotle
Augustine
A.J.Ayer
Mark Balaguer
Isaiah Berlin
Susanne Bobzien
George Boole
F.H.Bradley
C.D.Broad
C.A.Campbell
Joseph Keim Campbell
Ernst Cassirer
Roderick Chisholm
Chrysippus
Cicero
Randolph Clarke
Donald Davidson
Democritus
Daniel Dennett
René Descartes
Richard Double
John Earman
Laura Waddell Ekstrom
Epictetus
Epicurus
John Martin Fischer
Philippa Foot
Alfred Fouilleé
Harry Frankfurt
Richard L. Franklin
Carl Ginet
Ian Hacking
Ishtiyaque Haji
Stuart Hampshire
Georg W.F. Hegel
Martin Heidegger
R.E.Hobart
Thomas Hobbes
David Hodgson
Shadsworth Hodgson
Ted Honderich
David Hume
William James
Robert Kane
Tomis Kapitan
Immanuel Kant
Keith Lehrer
Gottfried Leibniz
David Lewis
John Locke
John R. Lucas
Lucretius
Hugh McCann
Colin McGinn
Michael McKenna
Alfred Mele
John Stuart Mill
Dickinson Miller
G.E.Moore
Thomas Nagel
Friedrich Nietzsche
P.H.Nowell-Smith
Robert Nozick
William of Ockham
Timothy O'Connor
Charles Sanders Peirce
Derk Pereboom
Steven Pinker
Karl Popper
Willard van Orman Quine
Ayn Rand
Thomas Reid
Charles Renouvier
Josiah Royce
Bertrand Russell
Paul Russell
Gilbert Ryle
Moritz Schlick
Arthur Schopenhauer
John Searle
Henry Sidgwick
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
J.J.C.Smart
Saul Smilansky
Galen Strawson
Peter Strawson
Eleonore Stump
Richard Taylor
Kevin Timpe
Peter van Inwagen
Manuel Vargas
John Venn
Kadri Vihvelin
G.H. von Wright
R. Jay Wallace
Ted Warfield
Roy Weatherford
Alfred North Whitehead
David Widerker
David Wiggins
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Susan Wolf

Scientists

Neils Bohr
Ludwig Boltzmann
Max Born
Stephen Brush
Arthur Holly Compton
Abraham de Moivre
John Eccles
Arthur Stanley Eddington
Albert Einstein
Richard Feynman
A.O.Gomes
Joshua Greene
Martin Heisenberg
Werner Heisenberg
Pierre-Simon Laplace
David Layzer
Henry Margenau
James Clerk Maxwell
Steven Pinker
Max Planck
Henri Poincaré
Erwin Schrödinger
William Thomson (Kelvin)
John von Neumann
Daniel Wegner

 
Adequate Determinism
Adequate Determinism is the kind of determinism we have in the world.
It is the determinism of Newtonian physics, capable of sending men to the moon and back with astonishing accuracy. It is the determinism of those physiologists who think that quantum uncertainty is insignificant in the macromolecular structures of cell biology.
We are happy to agree with scientists and philosophers who feel that quantum effects are for the most part negligible in the macroscopic world. We particularly agree that they are negligible when considering the causally determined will and the causally determined actions set in motion by decisions of that will.
In particular, adequate determinism is all that determinist philosophers ever wanted or needed for moral responsibility.
Adequate determinism gives compatibilists the kind of free will that they need and that they say they want.
However, quantum mechanics is not negligible in some important cases. We know that quantum uncertainty exists in the world and so there have been unpredictable and uncaused events that have broken the causal chain of strict determinism.
Such new "uncaused causes" (causa sui) have not resulted in the collapse of reason or stopped the progress of science, as some philosophers and scientists feared. The Stoic Chrysippus, warned in the third century B.C.E.
"Everything that happens is followed by something else which depends on it by causal necessity. Likewise, everything that happens is preceded by something with which it is causally connected. For nothing exists or has come into being in the cosmos without a cause. The universe will be disrupted and disintegrate into pieces and cease to be a unity functioning as a single system, if any uncaused movement is introduced into it."
Certain "thought experiments" magnify microscopic quantum uncertainty to macroscopic levels. Perhaps the most famous is Schrödinger's Cat. Perhaps the most common are simple Geiger counters, which record the spontaneous radioactive decay of unstable atoms, much of it driven by cosmic radiation, a major source of genetic variation that drives natural selection.
None of these totally random events interferes in any significant way with adequate determinism in the macroscopic world.
But these random events drive the creation of new species and we can show that they underlie all creativity, all actions that bring new information into the universe, whether the formation of stars and galaxies or the writing of a new play.
Adequate determinism is one of the critical requirements for free will.
For Teachers
For Scholars

Chapter 1.4 - Philosophy Chapter 2.2 - The History of Free Will
Part One - Introduction Part Three - Value
Normal | Teacher | Scholar